Wednesday, July 15, 2009

BD impressions: The International

10:37 AM / BD Impressions / Comments25 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

The International, the latest film from Run Lola Run director Tom Tykwer, is a plodding, muddled and not very interesting affair that is so infuriatingly po-faced that it collapses under its own weight. A terrifically staged shoot-out at the Güggenheim Museum in New York notwithstanding, this film is a waste of its director's talents. Clive Owen, an actor I've always found to be rather bland and unconvincing, is completely out of his depth here, and Naomi Watts is criminally underused as his sidekick of sorts. At least it looks like a million bucks: Tykwer has that slick, cold, ultra-modern, ultra-calculated visual sensibility that many of his fellow German filmmakers possess (Robert Schwentke is another), and it serves as a perfect antidote against the hyper-kinetic, unplanned shakycam fiascos favoured by many of today's action filmmakers (*cough* Paul Greengrass *cough*).

Why is it that the weakest films so often end up getting the best transfers? The International may be the best-looking BD title yet - it's certainly in the top three or four titles in my collection. The film was shot in a combination of Super35 and the Arri 765 65mm process, although it's not entirely clear which scenes are which. In any event, the film is as sharp as a tack throughout, whether we're talking extreme close-ups or extreme long shots. Some of the wide establishing shots are just breathtaking (see Example 18), and likewise the tighter shots allow you to see every pore and hair on the actors' faces. The grain looks dense and natural throughout, and I could spot nothing untoward in the way of compression artefacts. This really is a terrific, terrific-looking disc that I believe raises the bar in terms of what we should be able to expect from a BD release. Exemplary. 10/10

The International
studio: Sony Pictures; country: UK; region code: ABC; codec: AVC;
file size: 31.5 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 38.3 Mbit/sec

The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International The International

 
25 Comments

1. Kram Sacul said:

Ultra fine detail everywhere and that city shot makes Baraka look like a pile of mushy crap. All BDs should be this unfiltered.

(Posted on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 12:39 PM)

2. Sound Designer Dan said:

This film had a 4K DI. The thing is that all 2009 releases from Sony and Warner Bros. are now having their DIs at 4K.

(Posted on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at 9:24 PM)

3. Erik said:

In Tykwer's "defense," this film was supposedly reshot extensively.

A nitpick about 2K-4K/2k-4k from someone who lurks around these pages. No offense to anyone, nor will I bring this up again:

"Just because people are negligent with SI-units doesn't make it right for that reason. k = kilo, K = kelvin. 2K is the same as -271.15 degrees Celsius."

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 2:35 AM)

4. Vincent Pereira said:

On the Hometheaterforum, noted anti-DNR activist Michel Hafner says he doesn't like the look of this Blu-ray:

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/forum/thread/289780/a-few-words-about-the-international-in-blu-ray#post_3583925

And Kram, have you actually WATCHED the "BARAKA" Blu-ray yet, or are you still bashing it based entirely on screen shot comparisons alone, as you usually do? I'm surprised your head didn't explode when Xylon posted his positive comments about the GHOSTBUSTERS Blu-ray in his comparison thread at the AVS Forum, where you had already predictably written several negative posts about it even though you hadn't seen the disc.

Vincent

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 6:40 AM)

5. Dom said:

Clive Owen was pretty good in Closer...

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 11:43 AM)

6. Kram Sacul said:

Vince, I've seen the Baraka BD and it's filtered just like the screen captures. Am I supposed to be dazzled by it?

Ghostbusters has been shown on HDNet so the problems with the transfer on the BD were predicted years ahead of time.

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM)

7. Dom said:

Michael, when are you gonna pickup Ghostbusters and give us your thoughts?

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 1:17 PM)

8. Dom said:

http://www.find-dvd.co.uk/blu-ray/Ghostbusters-Blu-ray/1093115.htm

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 1:20 PM)

9. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Dan:

Actually I believe this one was "only" 2K - at least as per Robert Harris (see Vincent's link) and the admittedly non-gospel IMDB.


Vincent:

Interesting. I'm aware of Michel Hafner via the AV Science Forum and his anti-DNR stance, but needless to say I disagree with him completely as regards this film. It's a shame he doesn't go into more detail about his dislikes - "too digital" and "processed" is a bit vague. The film certainly doesn't look "film-like" in the manner of a theatrical print or a non-DI title, but I would dispute the notion that it look processed.


Dom:

Clive Owen was the least of Closer's problems. :p

As for Ghostbusters, I don't have a burning desire to pick up a copy, but I'll add it to my rental queue. I must, however, stress that I'm unfamiliar with the film so wouldn't be able to comment on whether the BD looks "correct" or not.

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM)

10. Bleddyn Williams said:

I watched this last weekend, and thought it looked terrific.

But I was shocked that the man who gave us "Run Lola Run" made this plodding, uninteresting "thriller". The deadpan deliveries struck me as harkening back to the thrillers of the 1970s, but instead, gave the impression that even the cast were uninterested in what was going on! My wife fell asleep, and who on earth could blame her.

I do agree that somehow the worst films get the best transfers! -sigh-

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM)

11. Sound Designer Dan said:

You're right Michael. It seems that a handful of releases from Sony are done with a 4K DI. The only Sony film this past year done with a 4K DI is Angels and Demons. I know that the upcoming CGI-fest 2012 has a 4K DI. 20th Century Fox had Wolverine scanned to a 4K DI and Paramount did their first 4K DI release with Joe Wright's The Soloist.

The only studio right now that is doing 4K DIs with every film is Warner Bros, according to this press release: http://www.hometheaterforum.com/forum/thread/274434/warner-bros-new-movie-policy-everything-will-be-released-in-4k.

(Posted on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at 5:47 PM)

12. Vincent Pereira said:

Kram:

I don't expect you to be dazzled by anything. By this time it's obvious to any rational human being what a complete tool you are.

Vincent

(Posted on Friday, July 17, 2009 at 7:04 AM)

13. Anonymous said:

I believe only the exterior building shots were shot in 65mm. Agree 100% on the 10/10 rating. The perfect PQ was the only reason I could finish watching this mess of a film.

(Posted on Friday, July 17, 2009 at 7:19 AM)

14. Kram Sacul said:

What's your beef, Vincent?

(Posted on Friday, July 17, 2009 at 3:11 PM)

15. Tyler said:

Clive Owen was amazing in Children Of Men. Plays resignation perfectly.

(Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 1:39 AM)

16. Author Profile Page Michael said:

I'd forgotten about Children of Men. You're right, that was a very good performance.

(Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 10:03 AM)

17. Erik said:

Tyler -- Indeed... CROUPIER, CHILDREN OF MEN, GOSFORD PARK, INSIDE MAN, and especially CLOSER (the famous 'f-off and die' scene with Julia Roberts is a powerhouse). Even SHOOT 'EM UP sort of worked; mainly because that film was utterly insane and anti-studio.

(Posted on Saturday, July 18, 2009 at 2:05 PM)

18. Kram Sacul said:

He's a good actor. Just needs more varied roles.

(Posted on Sunday, July 19, 2009 at 2:16 PM)

19. Kram Sacul said:

Still no explanation, Vincent? Figures.

(Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2009 at 10:16 AM)

20. Dirk Diggler said:

You're a tool, no explanation required.

(Posted on Thursday, July 23, 2009 at 3:14 PM)

21. Vincent Pereira said:

What Dirk said.

Honestly, we've been over this time and time again on the AVS forum, which I no longer read or contribute to thanks to folks like you.

Vincent

(Posted on Friday, July 24, 2009 at 3:50 AM)

22. Kram Sacul said:

I have no problem with that. I'm sure the "everything is fine" people at Bluray.com and HTF love you.

(Posted on Friday, July 24, 2009 at 12:38 PM)

23. Author Profile Page Michael said:

No offence, guys, but can you all cool it with the sniping at each other? I'm all for differences of opinion, but dragging personal grievances from another web site on to here and resorting to name-calling isn't contributing anything to this discussion.

(Posted on Friday, July 24, 2009 at 12:51 PM)

24. Kram Sacul said:

Agreed. Looking forward to your reviews.

(Posted on Friday, July 24, 2009 at 2:05 PM)

25. ChuckZ said:

I still can't get over how ridiculously good looking this disc is. The level of detail is oustanding. Truly, if there were ever a disc to deserve it, this should get an 11/10 for PQ (with all due respect to Spinal Tap).

The grain is so immeasurably fine, yet the encode was done to perfection to retain it.

The 65mm shots can take on an IMAX film any day.

(Posted on Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM)

 
Note: to combat spam and simplify site maintenance, all comments must be approved prior to appearing on the site. This is a necessary evil due to the volume of spam the site receives.