Sunday, September 20, 2009

The lesser of two evils

5:04 PM / Blu-ray / Comments6 Comments

Blu-ray
Blu-ray

Well, this is just frustrating. I've taken a look at yesterday's acquisition, the North American release of Hannibal from 20th Century Fox/MGM (only available as part of the three-disc The Hannibal Lecter Collection), and while it does fix one of the significant problems with the already available UK and German releases, it creates another.

The US release of Hannibal was originally announced for release on April 3, 2007, and then mysteriously disappeared when Fox suddenly got cold feet about Blu-ray and didn't release any titles on the format for nearly a year. It has now shown up more than two years later, and it's pretty clear that the master merely lay on a shelf for the duration of that period with no additional work done to it. The trailers on the disc (its only bonus features) include launch title Bulletproof Monk, the encode is an old MPEG-2 jobbie on a single layer BD-25, and the files on the disc, when viewed in Windows Explorer, bear a creation date of December 18, 2006 and a "last modified" date of January 24, 2007. Well, it's good to know Fox haven't just been dicking around all this time (sarcasm alert).

As for image quality, how does it compare with the already deeply mediocre UK and German releases (both of which looked virtually identical)? Well, it's different, I'll give them that, but sadly it's basically inferior across the board. The earlier releases were no great shakes in the detail department, but this one is worse, with fine details becoming smudged and indistinct. The letterboxing at the top and bottom of the frame is heavily blurred (it was crystal clear on the other two discs), suggesting that the entire image has been filtered. Look at the bird seed in the second of the three examples posted below for an indication of just how much detail is lost:

UFA (Region ABC, Germany)

Hannibal Hannibal Hannibal

20th Century Fox/MGM (Region ABC, USA)

Hannibal Hannibal Hannibal

On the other hand, the US release does rectify one major problem with the UK and German discs: the misframing. Both of these earlier releases lacked head room, meaning that a number of shots looked unnaturally cramped towards the top of the screen. (Again, look at the second example, posted above, for a clear demonstration of this.) The US release improves the situation significantly in this respect, and reveals that it wasn't simply a case of the image being shifted too far up: the European releases are actually stretched vertically. While they are all framed more or less identically at the bottom of the screen, the US version has significantly more room at the top. The first example, showing the burned-in video time codes that are part of the title design, demonstrates admirably how misframed the European releases are and how the US release, while considerably better, is still not ideal. By contrast, take a look at this shot of the same frame, an actual projection of the film at its New York premiere (taken from the Breaking the Silence documentary included on the European BDs and the original 2-disc DVD release), where the framing appears to be spot-on:

Hannibal

(Ignore the discolouration: the shot was presumably taken with a camera in night-vision mode.)

And yet... I don't know. It's "pick your poison" time. The bare-bones nature of the US release is unlikely to make it an appealing option, but then again, The Hannibal Lecter Collection is currently the only way to get Michael Mann's Manhunter, so I would imagine a number of people will be ending up with this disc anyway. Which would you prefer? A (more or less) properly framed bare-bones release with inferior image quality, or an incorrectly framed release with slightly better image quality and a cavalcade of extras? You choose.

 
6 Comments

1. LGans316 said:

As always, thanks Whiggles for catching the greedy FOX and the roaring lion red handed. FOX/MGM can kiss my a**.

(Posted on Sunday, September 20, 2009 at 7:10 PM)

2. Johan said:

A very noticeable difference in detail, but not enough for me to choose the very incorrectly framed European version, there is almost nothing worse than when the picture properties is tampered with. I hope Silence of the lambs got better treatment than this, as it is, in my optinion, the best in the pack. Keep up the good work!

(Posted on Sunday, September 20, 2009 at 10:13 PM)

3. Author Profile Page Michael said:

The Silence of the Lambs does indeed look better, but the best-looking by far is Manhunter, ironically the oldest of the three.

(Posted on Sunday, September 20, 2009 at 10:28 PM)

4. Greg said:

I'll be sticking with my standard DVD version of this box-set (released in 2007).

I'd buy a single-disc release of MANHUNTER in a heartbeat though.

(Posted on Tuesday, September 22, 2009 at 3:33 AM)

5. niMANd said:

Don't you think that MGM edition is a little too much vertically compressed? Judging by the second shot, the one with the doves, you can see, that in the MGM version the doves in the lower right conner do not look that realistic. I mean in the shot from the European version doves have proportions o real birds, but in the US version they look vertically compressed.
However, the European version still looks stretched a little. And maybe my eyes are deceiving me, but it seems to me that the picture gets stretched in progression, when moving up the frame. I mean the upper portion of the frame is stretched more than the lower one. This disproportional stretching might also explain greater information loss in the upper portion of the frame compared to insignificant information loss in the lower portion of the frame.
But still, my eyes might be deceiving me =)

(Posted on Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 2:40 AM)

6. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Nimand:

It's hard to say one way or the other with any certainty. To the one thing I do feel confident about is that the UK and German releases are missing material at the top of the screen that should have been visible, and indeed were visible when screened theatrically. In terms of vertical dimensions, I'm not sure which release is correct (if either), but I can't say either of them leapt out at me as being distorted when I watched them. It was only when I compared screen captures side by side that I realised the European releases were "stretched" compared with the US version.

(Posted on Saturday, September 26, 2009 at 12:59 PM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at whiggles[at]ntlworld[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.