Sunday, October 18, 2009

BD impressions: Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs

2:10 PM / BD Impressions / Comments8 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs is, of course, Disney's first and the first North American animated feature (although not, as it happens, the first animated feature, despite more than seventy years of misinformation) - "the one that started it all", as the saying goes. It's incredibly highly regarded, even by those who generally look down their noses at animation, and yet I can't help feeling that its merit is largely statistical. Yes, it's a significant film, but it's far from Disney's best. The 1930s and 40s were a period of extremely rapid development for the medium of animation (no other art form in history grew so much in such a short space of time), and you only have to look at their next film, Pinocchio, to see how much they improved in every respect - from animation to characterisation to the fundamentals of good storytelling - in the space of three years. Snow White has some extremely impressive moments - Snow White's horror-filled dash through the forest and the Queen's transformation being particular highlights - but for the most part it drags, with the characters either bland (Snow White) or obvious (the dwarfs, each of whom has a single personality trait summed up by their name), and the animators spending way too long indulging in sight gags that really aren't all that funny. I wouldn't expect the studio's first attempt at a full length feature to be a masterpiece, so I'm content to appreciate it for what it is: a vital stepping stone on the path to greatness.

Image quality: More or less what I expected. As with all the HD masters they have created since Alice in Wonderland (for the 2004 Masterpiece Edition DVD release), Disney have gone down the "let's pretend this film was never shot on film" route and delivered an image that has been subjected to a heavy amount of digital manipulation and is therefore no longer an accurate representation of what audiences saw in theatres back in 1937. The arguments for and against this sort of revisionism have been heard countless times already, and I'm not going to waste yet more bandwidth regurgitating them, so instead I'll simply say that is what it is, and you'll either like how it looks or you won't.

Detail varies wildly on a shot by shot basis, but I'm inclined to think that this is the result of the photography itself rather than the transfer. Some shots (e.g. Example 5) were clearly out of focus when they were originally shot, and there's nothing that can be done about them. On other occasions, the image looks exceedingly crisp (e.g. Example 3), but most of the time it falls somewhere in between the two extremes. Unfortunately, whether or not you feel that the grain reduction is a betrayal of the film's original look, it can't be denied that the process has, in places, caused noticeable damage: Example 8, for instance, shows that the process has played havoc with the character outlines, resulting in a smudgy, blocky appearance that also affected the BD of Sleeping Beauty to a degree. (On the other hand, I don't recall coming across anything like this in Pinocchio.) For purists like myself, the handful of instances in which the natural grain texture manages to slip through (e.g. Example 2) offer a tantalising and extremely frustrating glimpse at what might have been.

Compression is well-handled for the most part, but the rainstorm at the film's climax is a shitstorm of compression artefacts, which I'm sorry to say includes some of the worst macroblocking I've seen on a BD title. See Example 17 for a particularly noxious instance.

Overall, this release is a bit of a mixed bag. Disney have attempted to make a film from 1937 look like it was shot in 2009, and while what they've actually managed to achieve is impressive, there's a limit to what you can do with material of this vintage before you begin to damage it. Ironically, had the restoration team been less overzealous in their treatment of the film, it would probably have looked more cohesive and impressive as a whole. I find myself wishing, not for the first time, that Disney would take a more cautious approach to their restorations, allowing the material to show its age, so to speak, rather than attempting to make it into something it isn't. If anyone has the BD or HD DVD of The Adventures of Robin Hood, they should take a look at the bonus Looney Tunes cartoons, Rabbit Hood and Katnip Kollege especially, for an example of how to make vintage animation shine in HD while still retaining the characteristics of film. 7/10

PS. Rather irritatingly, the opening titles are windowboxed, a process that really should be done away with in the age of high definition and overscan-free displays.

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs
studio: Buena Vista; country: USA; region code: A; codec: AVC;
file size: 18.3 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 31.61 Mbit/sec

Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs

 
8 Comments

Curious what you think of the DisneyView feature that has been used on this release and Pinocchio.

I rather like it, I think the art is classy and, for the most part, not distracting.

(Posted on Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 7:03 PM)

2. Author Profile Page Michael said:

The side bars? I watched it without them. I sampled them on Pinocchio but turned them off after a few minutes because, as nice as the art was, it struck me as no way to watch a film.

(Posted on Sunday, October 18, 2009 at 7:06 PM)

3. Anthony said:

To FoxyMulder.

Apologies for addressing you here but I see that you no longer check your account on AVS. I hope you will consider continuing your work on some other site/forum as those wanting to see quality authentic transfers would miss out on another voice going away.

Thanks for all you tried to do on AVS.

(Posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 3:57 AM)

4. Marcus said:

I purchased this too (though I got a different cover) and wasn't too bothered with "Disney vision."

Yes, Disney has made much better films (The similar Sleeping Beauty for example is a far superior film in nearly every aspect), but what they've achieved here was very impressive. The main problem with Snow White has always been the mirror's creepy taste in women. The queen is far better looking than the title character. :D

As for the bland characterization of Snow White, well... Aurora and Cinderella are not exactly far more interesting characters. It wasn't until 1989's The Little Mermaid that Disney princesses finally got a strong personality.

(Posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 4:39 AM)

So, in other words, Snow White is animation's equivalent of Friday the 13th - not the first in the genre, but the one that opened the floodgates.

And I think that's the only time a Disney film can be compared legitimately to Friday the 13th...

(Posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM)

6. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Marcus:

There seem to be about a bazillion different versions of this release, including separate "BD cover" and "DVD cover" editions, despite both containing exactly the same discs.

It's true what you say about characters like Aurora and Cinderella, and perhaps that's why the princess fairytales tend not to be my favourite Disney movies. (Actually, it almost always tends to be the case that, regardless of the genre, Disney's protagonists are fairly bland, with the secondary characters being the ones people tend to remember. Even the likes of Aladdin and Ariel are a bit insipid.) My absolute favourites are Pinocchio and Lady and the Tramp, although I tend to find that there's something to like in all their films up to and including The Jungle Book (after that, things tend to be a bit hit and miss until the second Golden Age in the late 80s).

The interesting thing about Snow White is that, however highly regarded it might be, some saw it as hokey and kitsch even around the time of its original release. For instance, Bob Clampett parodied it mercilessly a mere five years later with his masterful (and sadly unlikely to ever see the light of day) Coal Black and de Sebben Dwarfs.


Baron:

You know, come to think of it, the horror sequences in Snow White are scarier than anything in Friday the 13th...

(Posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 3:32 PM)

7. Marcus said:

Personally I would put HALLOWEEN as the film that opened the floodgates of the slasher genre, not really FRIDAY THE 13th (though that was the first successful Halloween rip-off compared to He Knows When You're Alone).

The scene in Mario Bava's Black Sunday where the 13-year old girl goes to milk the cow and is then startled by Asa's brother running a carriage is pretty much a live action rendition of Snow White's ride through the forest. But I'm pretty sure you're all familiar with how Snow White was important to Italian horror films.

(Posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 10:51 PM)

8. Marcus said:

Also while I agree with the notion that plenty of Disney films have bland characters... out of all the princess films done while Walt Disney still lived, I still say Sleeping Beauty is by far the best.

Aurora is reduced to merely 18 minutes of screentime, leaving plenty of time for far more interesting characters such as the three fairies (perhaps the most effective female comic relief characters out of any Disney film), Maleficent (one of the best Disney villains), and above all Prince Phillip who for once does something other than marry the princess at the end of the film.

I am very excited for checking the Blu-Ray release of that film actually, as it is one of the most visually impressive Disney films with a loooooong production process.

(Posted on Monday, October 19, 2009 at 11:33 PM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at whiggles[at]ntlworld[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.