Tuesday, November 24, 2009

BD impressions: Amelie

7:03 PM / BD Impressions / Comments5 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

One of my favourite films of all time. I've already written about it here, so if you want to know why I like it so much, click the link.

Image quality: Amelie's first BD release came in September 2008, a broadly disappointing affair from Canadian label TVA Films consisting of a 1080i encode and a lack of English subtitles. (Many seemed convinced that the fact that this disc was 1080i was the reason for its disappointing image quality. I haven't watched the disc myself, but the screen captures I've seen suggest that the problems stem from excessive noise reduction and poor compression.) In an uncharacteristic display of self-restraint, I opted to wait for another label to get it right.

That label turned out to be Australian company Icon Home Entertainment, responsible for some slam-dunk releases including the UK Transsiberian and the Australian The Descent. (Oh, and they were responsible for the recent Braveheart remaster. Need I say more?) There was little doubt in my mind that Icon would deliver a better release than TVA, and I was right: the Australian Amelie BD is a colossal improvement on its Canadian counterpart. Gone is the piss-poor compression and blitzkrieg of NR. Detail is greatly improved and the healthy bit rate gives the film room to breathe. It's also enough of an improvement over the standard definition DVD releases for me to recommend it unhesitatingly to those who already own one of the existing releases. (Duh.) I was, on the whole, pretty satisfied with the presentation.

And yet it's not perfect. Far from it. Broadly speaking it's good, but I'm not one of those people for whom "good" is the same thing as "good enough". Amelie was an early digital intermediate title, and the technology then was not what it is now. Detail is, on the whole, a little disappointing, and edges show the sort of ringing I tend to associate with filtering. What looks like edge enhancement can also be glimpsed at times (see Example 2), although thankfully not too often. I also spotted a handful of instances of a very odd artefact whereby, in certain shots, coloured dots became visible - usually pink or blue-green. (See here and here.) I'm at a loss to explain these.

It's also worth pointing out that the DI team have gone somewhat overboard with the colour timing, resulting in an image that lacks dynamic range and feels a little overbearing at times. On the audio commentary (unfortunately not included on this BD), Jean-Pierre Jeunet expresses some regret at having had the colours pushed so far, and I'm inclined to agree, particularly with regard to the proliferation of yellow. Still, that's ultimately an issue with the film itself rather than the disc. I just thought I should mention it here in case anyone was wondering if my final score took it into account (it doesn't). 7/10

Amelie
studio: Icon; country: Australia; region code: ABC; codec: AVC;
file size: 27.1 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 31.76 Mbit/sec

Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie Amelie

 
5 Comments

1. Kram Sacul said:

Looks decent considering the quality was locked in 8 years ago.

(Posted on Tuesday, November 24, 2009 at 9:53 PM)

This is indeed a lovely film. And if even hardened cynics like you and myself can say that, Michael, it's clearly doing something right.

(Posted on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 at 10:32 AM)

3. The Poster said:

Where did you buy this Australian release?

I found it at http://dstore.com.au, but I don't know if they ship worldwide, and it's backordered right now.

(Posted on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 at 2:51 PM)

4. Author Profile Page Michael said:

The Poster:

I got mine from DVD Crave.

(Posted on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 at 2:55 PM)

5. ChuckZ said:

I like the picture quality of this movie (I didn't say aesthetic). It has that in between film and DI look like The Matrix.

(Posted on Friday, December 4, 2009 at 10:25 AM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at whiggles[at]ntlworld[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.