Friday, December 11, 2009

BD impressions: Inglourious Basterds

5:03 PM / BD Impressions / Comments7 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

In his review of Inglourious Basterds, Mark Kermode said that the film had some good ideas in it but didn't really work as a whole, or words to that effect. While I like Quentin Tarantino's latest opus a lot more than the esteemed Dr. K. did, I think there's some level of truth in what he said about it. I've been growing more and more convinced that Tarantino just doesn't make great movies. What he does make are movies with great moments in them, and these moments tend to be memorable enough that they overshadow the lesser elements in the long run.

Inglourious Basterds has a lot of these great moments in it. Unfortunately, like the previous Death Proof, it also has a lot of overly long, rambling and frankly tedious dialogue scenes in which characters sit and talk to each other about subjects that are only tangentially (if at all) related to the plot. This is most pronounced in the extended sequence in which the eponymous Basterds meet German double agent Bridget von Hammersmark (Diane Kruger) in a tavern outside Paris. This is meant to be a straightforward rendezvous, but it turns sour when they find themselves in the company of a band of rowdy German soldiers and a Gestapo officer. The outcome of the scene is terrific and has lasting consequences that alter the manner in which the film's climax plays out, but rather than getting down to business, Tarantino leaves the audience dangling for what seems like ages, eking out an ultimately irrelevant game of "Guess Who?" that seems to exist for no other reason than to allow him to indulge in movie trivia via the on-screen characters.

Death Proof's entire raison d'être, the thing that made all the waffle worthwhile in the long run, was the spectacular car chase that comprised the film's climax. Likewise, the memory of Inglourious Basterds' less engaging scenes (and believe me, there are a lot of them) fades away when all the principle players descend on the Le Gamaar cinema for a movie premiere that literally sets the audience on fire. Taken as a whole, the film seems ill-disciplined and in need of some judicious editing but, watching as the face of Jewish orphan Shosanna Dreyfus (Mélanie Laurent) fills the cinema screen and informs a packed audience of Nazi bigwigs that every one of them is about to die, it's hard not to think - if only for a few moments - "Fuck it, this is a great movie." I don't know how he does it, but Tarantino repeatedly puts out films that, by rights, shouldn't work and a lot of the time don't work. When they cook, though, they really cook.

By the way, despite the film's title, this is Shosanna's story. I was surprised by just how peripheral the Basterds actually were in the outcome. When all said and done, they might as well not have bothered showing up. In fact, you could argue that things would have gone a lot more smoothly if they hadn't. As far as the acting is concerned, the honours definitely go to Mélanie Laurent and Christoph Waltz, the latter playing the deceptively polite but utterly deadly "Jew hunter" Hans Landa. The Basterds themselves are basically caricatures, and not particularly interesting caricatures at that, but Laurent and Waltz are blessed with the two most interesting parts in the script, and they utterly nail their respective roles.

Image quality: This is a fantastic disc from Universal. Inglourious Basterds is Tarantino's first anamorphic film since Pulp Fiction, and I was actually slightly surprised when I saw the film's first instance of anamorphic lens distortion, as the image has a razor sharpness that one doesn't normally associate with the process. The level of fine detail on display is frequently jaw-dropping - just look at all those facial pores in the close-ups, not to mention Mélanie Laurent's moles. Fine grain is visible throughout, and always looks natural and unmolested. The encode really is stellar - if there are any visible compression artefacts, I didn't spot them.

The only real flaw is something that I suspect stems from the downconversion process from a 4K master, and that is some light aliasing on diagonal edges. It doesn't show up too often, but when it does the effect is mildly distracting. The brim of Christoph Waltz's hat suffers quite a bit in the opening sequence, and the shutters in Example 7, plus the curvature of the cinema's billboard, show it up as well. Otherwise, though, top marks all round. 9.5/10

Inglourious Basterds
studio: Universal; country: UK; region code: ABC; codec: AVC;
file size: 34.8 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 32.62 Mbit/sec

Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds Inglourious Basterds

 
7 Comments

1. Kentai said:

As a yank I'm envious of the UK slipcover/case art, but not quite envious enough to import. That German steelbook almost had me until I realized it was censored...

Tarantino's been inventing weak excuses to wax poetic (mostly to himself) since the opening of Pulp Fiction, but I can't say I don't still love every minute of it. It's always been unapolagetic geeky musings at its' finest, with just enough quality set pieces to distract the narrative from how egotistical the entire experience really *should* feel.

I can't really call it writerspeak - it's something much more specific to QT himself. One of the most blatant examples was probably David Carradine talking about superheroes, he was little more than a mouthpiece for QT himself, lacking only the evil grin and lightning fast pace had he delivered the monologue himself.

(Posted on Saturday, December 12, 2009 at 12:34 AM)

2. Steini said:

I really didn't mind the slow pace when i saw it in the cinema (though I suspect that it will be a bit more tedious on repeat viewings).

I think it's a great improvement over Death Proof.

(Posted on Saturday, December 12, 2009 at 2:44 AM)

3. Dethroned Emperor said:

I love all of Tarantino's work up to and including the Kill Bill films, but Death Proof & Inglourious Basterds bored me senseless. For me they were clock watching episodes and I couldn't wait for them to finish, I just cant put up with the rambling and tedious dialogue any more, I just sat there saying to myself FOR GODS SAKE GET ON WITH IT. I almost feel bad for saying it because I love his previous work and don't find the dialogue boring in his early films. (I realise I'm in the minority judging by IMDB's score of 8.5/10 & number 64 in the top 250).

I just hope his next piece isn't as dialogue driven and gets to the point more quickly.

(Posted on Saturday, December 12, 2009 at 3:27 PM)

4. Marcus said:

Personally I love Tarantino's dialogue, and the fact that he lets the conversations go on as opposed to simply trimming them to get going for the next scene is one of the reasons I admire him as a director. These are the moments I loved in Inglorious Bestards: The opening scene, where Waltz simply talks and talks (while we as the audience know something bad is going to happen) or the sequence that Michael mentioned involving the "Guess Who?" game (my favorite piece of dialogue from the film).

I understand why someone would be upset at those scenes, but does anyone go arguing that Tarkovsy's films need trimming so we an get going for the next scene? Would Solaris be better without the 4 minute driving shot?

(Posted on Saturday, December 12, 2009 at 4:37 PM)

5. Kentai said:

Dethroned, did you see the "Extended" international cut, or the theatrical double-bill? To this day I've only seen the shorter cut of Deathproof, but I liked it just fine at 90-some minutes and wish there had been more to mull over.

I loved both "Grindhouse" films for different reasons, and I'd probably like the longer versions just fine, but the fact that I can't purchase the US theatrical experience (or even just the "Trailers") really dulls my enthusiasm to shell out $40.

(Posted on Saturday, December 12, 2009 at 9:11 PM)

6. Dethroned Emperor said:

@ Marcus, I'm not upset at those scenes just bored, I understand that he is building tension but in his last two films I feel its just overkill. Dont get me wrong, I admire what Tarantino has done with his films and I could sit and listen to him all day talking about movies, its just his last couple of films did nothing for me.

@ Kentai, I saw both the theatrical & extended cuts. After being disappointed the theatrical cut I thought Id give the extended version a spin to see if it made it any better but it didn't, just more chit-chat to sit through, but I will say the car chase at the end was excellent and whenever Kurt Russell was on screen it livened up.

(Posted on Sunday, December 13, 2009 at 12:16 PM)

7. Tyler said:

I loved it. And the dialogue is at least FAR better than Death Proof. Tarantino is masterful at suspense, and it's easily the first great movie he's done since Pulp. The first time watching it, I had no idea what the hell was going to happen.

(Posted on Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 2:44 PM)

 
Note: to combat spam and simplify site maintenance, BlogJanitor automatically closes comments on entries more than a month old.