Thursday, August 19, 2010

BD impressions: Centurion

8:51 PM / BD Impressions / Comments14 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

I was pleasantly surprised by CENTURION. After the disappointment of Neil Marshall's previous film, DOOMSDAY - a sloppy and ill-disciplined hodge-podge of homages to various genres which started off amusingly stupid but quickly succumbed to being just plain stupid - my hopes weren't exactly through the roof for his take on the fate of the infamous Ninth Legion which, so legend says, disappeared in Britain in the early second century AD. (Incidentally, it was also the subject of a book I read as a child, Rosemary's Sutcliff's THE EAGLE OF THE NINTH - itself being adapted for the screen by Jeremy Brock and Kevin Macdonald.)

To my surprise, it's actually very good, and far from the low-grade knock-off of GLADIATOR that the subject matter and promotion would seem to suggest. ("Britain's answer to GLADIATOR!" screams that exalted tome, NUTS, on the back cover - conveniently forgetting that GLADIATOR's director and most of its crew WERE British.) CENTURION is actually a chase movie that actually has quite a bit more in common with those POW escape movies than any historical epic I've ever seen. It's brief, bloody and not particularly subtle, but it knows exactly what it is and gives the audience what it wants to see: lots of tension, lots of battle scenes, and a fair amount of the old tomato ketchup. You've got a decent (some might say over-qualified) cast giving it their all, savvy use of the limited budget, and a director who absolutely knows the meaning of crowd-pleasing. You honestly couldn't ask for much more.

THE DESCENT remains Marshall's best film by a considerable margin, but he has regained a lot of the ground that he lost for me with DOOMSDAY, and I'm definitely looking forward to whatever he cooks up next.

Image quality: There are few nits to pick with this VC-1 encode from Pathé. The film does look a little soft at times, but I'm inclined to suspect that the photography itself is at fault here, for the look is inconsistent and some shots look significantly better than others. Compression is generally fine, although some wide shots do have that smoothed over, "watercolour" look that sometimes crops up in VC-1 encodes with inadequate bit rates. Basically, it's a fine-looking disc, albeit one that looks a little underwhelming when viewed straight after the remastered edition of the eleven-year-old GLADIATOR. 9/10

Centurion
studio: Pathé; country: UK; region code: B; codec: VC-1;
file size: 25 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 36.77 Mbit/sec

Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion Centurion

 
14 Comments

1. Christopher D. Jacobson said:

Damn region locking, ha. I saw a trailer for this a couple weeks ago at a theater that plays movies that don't receive wide releases. Looked kind of interesting, and I suspect a US BD won't be along for a while. That and they may botch the transfer for all I know.

(Posted on Thursday, August 19, 2010 at 9:51 PM)

2. Greg M said:

Please tell me Dominic West is bare-assed naked in full hi-def. Pretty please.

(Posted on Friday, August 20, 2010 at 1:01 AM)

3. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Chris:

Yeah, I'm not sure who has the US rights, so it could go either way really.


Greg:

'Fraid not, sorry. It does have him and Michael Fassbender running about with their tits out, though.

(Posted on Friday, August 20, 2010 at 3:52 PM)

4. gaeljet said:

how about fight club impressions??lol
thx...

(Posted on Friday, August 20, 2010 at 7:53 PM)

5. FoxyMulder said:

Its interesting that on IMDB it says Finland has a version running 130 minutes, makes me wonder if we will see a longer extended edition at a later stage.

Its just getting a cinema release this month in America, Magnolia has the rights.

http://boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=centurion.htm

Oh and an interesting interview with the director below.

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=68524

(Posted on Friday, August 20, 2010 at 8:50 PM)

6. Greg M said:

I suppose tits are better than nothing, Michael.

Glad to hear about the quality of the film, btw. I've actually avoided Doomsday for this long because I'd heard such mixed-to-negative things about it. I didn't want to be bummed out after loving Dog Soldiers and Descent so much.

(Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 2:53 AM)

7. Erik said:

1920x1200?

Oh, and DOOMSDAY is terrific. That is all. :)

(Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 5:17 AM)

8. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Gaeljet:

All in good time, all in good time...


Foxymulder:

130 minutes? That would mean an increase of nearly 40 minutes in its running time. Either CENTURION got KINGDOM OF HEAVENed, or that running time is a mistake.

And yeah, great interview. Thanks for sharing.


Erik:

Oops, forgot to crop them to 1920x1080. Because this was a VC-1 disc, I wasn't able to use DGAVCIndex for the captures as I normally do, so I ended up printscreening them from VLC Media Player, leading to them having my native desktop resolution. The captures aren't distorted in any way - they just have too much black at the top and bottom.

(Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 7:26 AM)

9. Erik said:

I gotcha, a bit of a pain to grab captures from VC-1 discs. As long as your video card doesn't affect the colors [of the film] in the program, it's perfectly fine. NVIDIA and PowerDVD do not play well together, for instance.

As for its running time: the official distributor here has the running time at 98 minutes...

(Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 4:18 PM)

10. FoxyMulder said:

Yah they talk about it on the IMDB boards, it might be the screening time of a test screening before they actually edited it down to make a better film, still with the way films often get released with additional scenes it wouldn't surprise me if a longer edition did get released next year.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1020558/board/thread/161953443?d=161953443&p=1#161953443

(Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 6:35 PM)

11. Erik said:

"Only" 30-40 minutes trimmed from a presumably rough cut is not bad. Most films overshoot by at least an hour, not at all uncommon to hear about directors having to 'find' the film in 3-4 hours of footage.

(Posted on Saturday, August 21, 2010 at 9:57 PM)

12. colinr said:

Great review. And add me to the list of Doomsday's supporters - it might be an extremely obvious Escape From New York/28 Days Later mashup (sorry, *homage*!) but was certainly entertaining enough, and on a scale that never seems to be attempted by British cinema. And Bob Hoskins rules!

(Posted on Sunday, August 22, 2010 at 9:36 PM)

13. Christopher D. Jacobson said:

Just to nerd out over a discovery I just made, Simon Bisley, a comic artist I quite enjoy, did a poster for this film:

http://heatvision.hollywoodreporter.com/2010/08/simon-bisley-centurion-poster-neill-marshall.html

Makes me smile, ha ha.

(Posted on Monday, August 30, 2010 at 7:08 AM)

14. Miley said:

To bad, the acting was quite poor, i expected more from this one!

(Posted on Friday, September 10, 2010 at 12:40 PM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at whiggles[at]ntlworld[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.