Monday, October 18, 2010

BD impressions: Romeo + Juliet

8:43 PM / BD Impressions / Comments6 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

There are those who hate Baz Luhrmann's bawdy take on ROMEO AND JULIET. I'm not one of them. I can fully understand why people would react unfavourably to the idea of transposing Shakespeare's dialogue into a relentlessly contemporary setting, but in my opinion it works, and I can't really think of any other filmmaker who could have pulled it off quite so successfully. What can I say? I love Luhrmann's work, even the maligned AUSTRALIA - he's the sort of director who could probably find a visually interesting way of filming a telephone directory. Stylistically, ROMEO + JULIET bridges the gap between the comparatively restrained STRICTLY BALLROOM and the utterly outrageous MOULIN ROUGE, though I find it very hard to pick a favourite between the three. I'm almost inclined to give the nod to MOULIN ROUGE, but something about ROMEO + JULIET keeps bringing me back to it. Who knows? Maybe I've been bewitched by Claire Danes.

Image quality: A very good, almost excellent presentation, derived from a new master from the original negative supervised by Luhrmann. When it's at its best, this transfer holds its own against just about any movie fifteen years younger than it, with excellent clarity and natural, unmolested grain. The disc is packed full of HD extras, and perhaps as a result of this the encoding does suffer. Most of the time, it's not an issue, but on a handful of occasions problems do become apparent, such as the nurse's red outfit in Example 10.

Aside from the compression, my main complaint relates to some weirdness that is going on during the pool scene, where Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes' faces and hair look rather blurry and smeary despite the grain in much of the background remaining pin-sharp (see Example 13). I don't think this is simply a camera focus issue: the fact that the grain appears blockier and more smoothed over on the actors' faces leads me to wonder whether some sort of selective reduction was applied. Something similar appears to be happening during the wedding scene, with only the shots of DiCaprio and Danes affected (see Example 14). These are not insignificant issues, but they appear relatively briefly. 8/10

Romeo + Juliet
studio: 20th Century Fox; country: USA; region code: A; codec: AVC;
file size: 25.1 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 30.01 Mbit/sec

Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet Romeo + Juliet

 
6 Comments

1. Kram Sacul said:

Haven't seen this movie in a long while but from your screenshots it seems to be almost all closeups.

(Posted on Monday, October 18, 2010 at 10:04 PM)

2. FoxyMulder said:

I can't remember how it looked in the cinema, a thought occurs to me, could it be deliberate and like the scenes in Resident Evil: Extinction where they smoothed a few spots from Milla's face but only on selected scenes. ?

(Posted on Monday, October 18, 2010 at 10:06 PM)

3. FoxyMulder said:

Oh and regarding my last comment, i know this was before digital tinkering really started to become the norm but maybe it was an early attempt, you can see some weird early attempts in Mars Attacks too.

(Posted on Monday, October 18, 2010 at 10:10 PM)

4. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Kram:

I must admit I hadn't noticed that. I suspect it's more my choice of shots than the film itself.


Foxy:

I suspect it IS deliberate - I can't think of any other explanation given the wedding scene, which cuts back and forth between smoothed-over DiCaprio/Danes and wrinkly Pete Postlethwaite in all his glory - but regardless of how it got there, it's distracting and rather badly done. I very much doubt that it was present back in 1996 - these don't look like opticals to me, which they would be if they had been effects shots.

(Posted on Monday, October 18, 2010 at 10:30 PM)

5. Daniel Joseph Sardella said:

The first theater performance I ever took part in was in 2008.
It was a version of R&J set in a trailer park.

All the characters had southern accents and each house (Montague/Capulet) had a trailer, on each side of the stage.

My g/f Victoria played the Daisy Duke wearing Juliet.

In the middle of the stage was a porch where the band (Mutt & The Chops) would perform southern rock songs (Lynyrd Skynyrd, Tom Petty, CCR, ZZ Top, etc).

I was Musical Director and also sang & played guitar on stage as "Mutt".
None of the dialogue was changed, but sexual innuendos, guns, cleavage & straw hats were abound.

It was a lot of fun.

(Posted on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 12:37 AM)

6. eric.exe said:

Moulin Rouge is only 1 mbit higher in video than R+J and it has zero compression issues, hrm...

(Posted on Tuesday, October 19, 2010 at 1:54 AM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.