Individual Entry
Land of Whimsy / news / Individual Entry
Thursday, December 2, 2010
BD impressions: Alien 3
2:08 PM / BD Impressions /
2 Comments
One of those cases where the tortuous production history is a lot more interesting than the resultant film.
ALIEN 3 is, to put it bluntly, a mess, and a lot of the time it's not even an entertaining mess. Taking into account the degree of behind the scenes interference to which it was subjected, I suppose the surprising thing is not that it ended up in such a chaotic state but rather that MORE films don't turn out this way, given that such tales of executive meddling aren't exactly uncommon in Hollywood (though this admittedly does seem to be a particularly extreme example).
I chose to watch the assembly cut, which I believe constitutes an approximation of David Fincher's ultimate intentions for the film before he abandoned the project during post-production, though that may have been a mistake as I felt the extended running time did it no favours, and I was certainly suffering from viewer's fatigue towards the end. In terms of its place in the series, it was obviously woefully inferior to ALIEN, and while I would mark it a good few notches below ALIENS as well, I must admit I did feel that there were certain aspects that it handled better than its predecessor.
It definitely got me on side at the beginning by dispensing with the insufferable Newt and captain whatsisname (the one played by Michael Beihn), and I felt that placing the characters in an environment with no access to firearms was a marvellous touch, avoiding as it did the gung-ho bang-bang malarkey from ALIENS. The attempted rape of Ripley was well-shot, and I enjoyed Charles Dance's understated performance as the medic... but on the other hand the various death scenes felt really lacklustre, and as with ALIENS the film succumbed to the burden of an over-sized cast I couldn't bring myself to care about (though oddly enough I found this cadre of rapists and murderers a whole lot less loathsome than the soldiers in the previous film).
Nicely shot, great score by Elliot Goldenthal... but on the other hand, really poor effects, a script that spends way too long treading water (there are only so many ways you can have characters saying "We're fucked" to each other before it becomes tedious), and a general sense of the ideas behind it being better than the execution. I definitely didn't get the sense that it was the atrocity some claim it to be, but I did feel that Fincher and co dropped the ball overall. That said, I can't help wondering to what extent its less than rosy reputation stems from the ALIENS fans being disappointed by its less gun-heavy, more understated approach.
Image quality: Oh dear, not a pretty sight at all. After being spoiled by the excellent quality of the previous two films on BD, I was disappointed to discover that Fox appear to have used an outdated master for the third instalment. Detail is inconsistent but leans towards soft for the most part. There is a fairly noticeable improvement in clarity in the scenes added back in for the assembly cut, but it would be a stretch to call even these "good". Grain reduction is apparent too, and the image tends to be pretty murky... although the latter may have been a deliberate aesthetic choice. Either way, it all looks incredibly mediocre and it's a damn shame to see this instalment in "the MU-TH-UR of all Blu-ray collections" (to quote the back of the box) given such half-assed treatment. 6/10
Alien 3
studio: 20th Century Fox; country: UK; region code: ABC; codec: AVC;
file size: 23.4 GB (theatrical cut), 29.4 GB (special edition);
average bit rate (including audio): 29.17 Mbit/sec (theatrical cut), 29.08 Mbit/sec (special edition)
2 Comments
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.
Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- News Archive Index
Categories
- Animation
- BD Impressions
- Blu-ray
- Books
- Cinema
- DVD
- Games
- General
- HD DVD
- Model Railways
- Music
- Podcast
- Reviews
- Technology
- Television
- Web























1. bosque said:
Hmm, shame. I thought you might have liked it more than you did. But very pleased to see your full review. All those low camera angles (hardly any of which you capped), the lighting and colours very similar to his next movie (Se7en). I like the Blu-Ray image much more than most people, although I remember seeing the movie when it was first released and you could hardly see any of the action in the tunnels - or maybe we've just got used to Fincher's low lighting since 1993.
(Posted on Friday, December 3, 2010 at 6:59 PM)