Wednesday, December 22, 2010

BD impressions: Videodrome

4:06 PM / BD Impressions / Comments5 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

The film: David Cronenberg is a director whose work I have to be in the right frame of mind to enjoy. I find his films to be very cold and misanthropic, and while I sometimes suspect that Sturgeon's Law applies as much to human beings as to anything else, I suspect my outlook on life is generally more optimistic than that of old Croney.

I liked VIDEODROME a great deal the first time I saw it, several years ago, and rewatching it the other night I found myself still admiring its obvious strengths, despite being a little less taken by it as a whole than I previously was. It's typical of early-to-mid-period Cronenberg, turning on a dime between gross-out horror and biting social commentary. (Although I've described the evolution of Cronenberg's style in recent years as "mainstreamification", it's fair to say that his old body horror obsessions haven't left him - they've simply been submerged beneath a more "accessible" surface.) The world he depicts is as grim, cold and unfeeling as anything else in his filmography, and the protagonist, Max Renn, is a character for whom it's difficult to like, dislike or feel any real sympathy for. I often feel that the characters in Cronenberg's films are not really intended to be seen as people at all but rather collections of flesh and bone destined to be graphically disembowelled or transformed. In a sense, they feel like films told from the point of view of a dispassionate observer - a scientist, which of course is precisely what Cronenberg started out as.

I remember reading somewhere that Cronenberg was still writing the script while the film was shot, and I suspect that may have something to do with the film's somewhat disjointed feel and uneven pace. At times I feel it lacks cohesion, even when taking into account the fact that its protagonist spends a great deal of time hallucinating. I'm not convinced it really conveys the feeling of being in a waking nightmare (at least not in the way that films such as MULHOLLAND DRIVE and INFERNO do), and I have a feeling that this is at least partly due to Cronenberg's cold, detached approach conflicting with a desire to convey an experience as deeply personal as hallucination.

Still, although it probably sounds like I'm coming down pretty heavily on it, I like VIDEODROME. It's a style of filmmaking (more overt body horror) that I'd love to see Cronenberg get back to one day. I really liked the unusually humanist (for Cronenberg) EASTERN PROMISES (I was less taken by A HISTORY OF VIOLENCE and my reaction to SPIDER was downright lukewarm), but I think there's something to be found in films like VIDEODROME, THE FLY and DEAD RINGERS that Cronenberg does better than anyone else, and the horror genre is a poorer place without his input. Love live the new flesh! 7/10

Image quality: Not exactly stunning, although the extent to which it could reasonably be expected to have looked any better is open to debate. Universal licensed the film to Criterion, and certainly the disc's look is of a piece with a number of Universal catalogue titles. The encoding, which in my experience tends to be Criterion's strongest point, is uniformly excellent, detail in close-ups is reasonably good and the grain, while a tad clumpy, is probably a pretty accurate representation of the source elements. When all said and done, I suspect that for it to look substantially better, we would have to go back to the original camera negative as opposed to the interpositive used here. Still, it looks substantially better than Criterion's DVD (derived from the same master) and is, on the whole, a worthwhile upgrade. 7/10

Videodrome
studio: Criterion; country: USA; region code: A; codec: AVC;
file size: 24.5 GB; average bit rate (including audio): 39.57 Mbit/sec

Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome Videodrome

 
5 Comments

1. Christopher D. Jacobson said:

Man, I want this. Bad. Baaaaaaaaaad. But I'll wait till I can get it at a cheap price—maybe even wait until another B&N sale.

By the way, off topic, but I know some other people were curious about the status of this movie and their orders, so: Amazon kept pushing back my order for the Szamanka Premium Edition. Contacted Mondo Vision about it, and they said,

We have shipped all outstanding orders to Amazon. As far as the Limited Edition showing out of stock this is something that Amazon needs to answer. As of today we have not received any new order from them. I believe they are having processing issues, otherwise there are enough copies in their inventory to fulfill all pre-orders.

So it sounds like Amazon are just being moronic for whatever reason.

Mazi at Mondo Vision also mentioned that Diabolik DVD have been sent copies of both editions of the film. I saw they had some copies of the premium edition in stock, so I canceled my Amazon order. It may have been exactly $7 more to order from Diabolik DVD (that was the shipping price), but I'm so fed up with Amazon regarding this title and decided to go through someone who would actually get the damn thing to me.

(Posted on Wednesday, December 22, 2010 at 10:34 PM)

2. Greg M said:

Santa dropped this off at my door this afternoon. I love the film and can't wait to check out this disc. Not to mention I never got a good look at the special features on the old Criterion DVD.

(Posted on Thursday, December 23, 2010 at 1:55 AM)

3. Daniel Joseph Sardella said:

@Greg M - Received my copy today as well! Psyched; LOVE this film

@Christopher J - I got my copy of this and Cronos (which arrived and I watched yesterday) both from Deep Discount for 25% (sale ended I believe), so they were $24 each.

(Posted on Thursday, December 23, 2010 at 3:27 AM)

4. Rich C said:

Judging from the comparison at capoholics I don't think this is a worthwhile upgrade, certainly not at the $30 Criterion price point. It's only a mild increase in quality and this is one title where I do think the DVD upscale IS good enough, at least until the Blu-Ray is released cheaper, and perhaps from a new scan, from someone else.

(Posted on Friday, December 24, 2010 at 6:08 AM)

5. Kentai said:

I've always been surprised at how little Cronenberg I've ever sat down and watched, considering how much the themes of alienation and biological transformation tend to click with me. I guess some of it comes down to a disastrous time I had watching Crash with my wife a few years ago, who didn't have the slightest clue what sort of unique horror she was getting herself into... I've never seen her (or anyone else) react so violently to a film, and short of seeing somebody lose their lunch due to the image on the screen, I don't think it'll ever be topped either.

Thankfully The Fly* has convinced her that he's not the Satan Incarnate, and now she says she actually wants to see Shivers. Clearly, I should have started with the nude Jeff Goldblum and worked my way from there.

Maybe it's the insomnia talking, but from here VIDEODROME looks pretty good - a bit "harsh", sure, but with plenty of detail and decent color reproduction. I can practically feel the texture on James Woods' ugly suit from here! :-)


(*The Fly has got to be the single softest BD I've ever seen! I can only assume that's just what the negative looks like, since there's no obvious signs of DVNR or low-pass filtering, but it's still an incredibly out-of-focus film. The only disc I think I own that even gives it solid competition in being a smeared blur for 2 hours is Bad Lieutenant - the real one, not the recent Herzog comedy that stole the title...)

(Posted on Friday, December 24, 2010 at 7:21 AM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.