Monday, March 21, 2011

BD impressions: Phenomena

2:59 PM / BD Impressions / Comments15 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

Note: Time constraints prevent me from doing a full review of PHENOMENA, as I have done for other recent Argento BD releases like INFERNO, TENEBRAE and DEEP RED. At some point in the future I might come back and add some thoughts on the extras (once I've had time to watch them). For the time being, though, I'm going to concentrate on the image quality.

The film: I consider PHENOMENA to be my Dario Argento "guilty pleasure". Although nowadays Argento's "golden period" is considered to stretch from DEEP RED in 1975 to OPERA in 1987, with PHENOMENA fitting comfortably under that umbrella, the press wasn't exactly kind to it when it was originally released, and seems to have been held up by more than a few as proof that Argento had lost it (a sentiment that has since been echoed every time a new Argento film has come out).

It has a reasonable claim to being Argento's craziest film, an ill-disciplined, kitchen-sink affair combining the supernatural elements and girls' school setting of SUSPIRIA with the more conventional logic of gialli like DEEP RED and TENEBRAE. It's not exactly a comfortable mix, and a liberal sprinkling of heavy metal doesn't do anything to make the film more cohesive, but it somehow works all the same. That's largely thanks to a young Jennifer Connelly's engaging screen presence (it's actually helpful to think of this as the less child-friendly evil twin of LABYRINTH, released a year later), the wonderfully evocative atmosphere of the "Swiss Transylvania", and a no-holds-barred bat-shit crazy third act. The latter somehow manages to make the at times meandering and inconsequential first 90 minutes worth sitting through... and let's face it, it's got a razor-wielding chimp, Donald Pleasence doing an awful Scottish accent, and Jennifer Connelly communicating telepathically with bugs! As such, I can fully understand those who consider this their favourite Argento film, even if in my opinion it's a long way from the grandeur of SUSPIRIRA and DEEP RED, or his next (and last truly great) film, OPERA. 8/10

Image quality: This is PHENOMENA's high definition debut, and after having watched more DVD copies of the film than I care to count, I feel reasonably confident in stating that it's a step forward in some respects and a step backward in others. It looks slightly less contrasty than its predecessors, and in terms of colour palette seems to fall somewhere between the heavily blue-tinted look of the Anchor Bay (US) and Imagica (Japanese) DVDs and the more natural-looking Medusa (Italian) release. Detail varies quite a bit, with some shots - particularly static ones - showing a decent amount of fine detail, but for the most part it's not great. As far as I can tell, this largely stems from the application of overzealous grain reduction. It's hard to tell whether this was on the master or something Arrow added themselves, but knowing that they grain reduced INFERNO themselves (or rather paid for an outside firm to do it), I have my suspicions.

In any event, the grain reduction has a seriously detrimental effect on the texture of the film, frequently giving the image the look of a watercolour painting (see Example 5). The striking Alpine landscapes become fuzzy and indistinct, and in a number of shots the grizzled Donald Pleasence looks like he has the skin texture of a man half his age. But none of this compares to the absolute havoc the grain reduction wreaks on shots with particularly rapid camera movement, such as the "we worship you" chant when the other pupils gang up on Jennifer. Here, the artefacts became so bad that I actually ended up rewinding the BD and going through it frame by frame because I couldn't believe what I was seeing (see Example 12). Bear in mind that, while Example 12 is a particularly severe demonstration of the effect, it's far from an isolated incident and simply hammers home that whoever applied the grain reduction wasn't paying attention to what they were doing.

This is the only HD release of PHENOMENA currently on the cards, so I suspect a lot of people will want to pick it up regardless. However, I felt incredibly short-changed by this presentation, and didn't get much pleasure out of watching it because I was constantly distracted by the destructive grain reduction. It's sad when a DVD release from a decade ago looks more film-like than a just-released BD, but that's unfortunately how things are. That's not to say that the BD of PHENOMENA looks worse than its standard definition predecessors - the improvement in detail puts paid to that - but I constantly found myself thinking about how much better it could have looked if it hadn't been mangled by overzealous technicians. 5/10

Phenomena
studio: Arrow Video; country: UK; region code: ABC;
codec: AVC; aspect ratio: 1.66:1

Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena Phenomena

PS. It's worth pointing out that this is the full-length 116-minute "integral" cut of the film rather than the 110-minute English-language export version released by Anchor Bay. The differences between the two cuts are too numerous and minute to list here, but there's a great guide over at Dark Dreams. Suffice it to say that, with so many (around 75) differences, many amounting to a frame or two here and a frame or two there, conforming the English language audio track (which was created for the 110-minute version) to the 116-minute version was no small feat. (Where no English audio exists, the film drops into Italian with English subtitles. Because most of the cuts were little more than slight trims at the beginning and end of shots, this only happens a handful of times - it's nowhere near as frequent as in DEEP RED.) On the whole, Arrow have done a good job, but there are a number of instances where the music unavoidably skips and repeats itself, and I also noticed at least two instances where dialogue that was in English on every previous English-language DVD inexplicably dropped into subtitled Italian here (these can be found at around 00:19:00 and 00:26:00 - there could well be more). It's a minor issue in the grand scheme of things, but a slightly perplexing one.

 
15 Comments

1. Kenneth said:

Nice review Michael! :)

(Posted on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 3:58 PM)

2. MCP said:

The wax effect seems really heavy.... dommage...

What about sounds and music score? I've always enjoyed the diverse mix of heavy metal, electronic pop, opera singing and outwordly prog tunes like the impressive "Valley" by Wyman and Taylor. On the whole, they should put a certain stress upon home theater sound systems (at least for finding an optimal tuning set).

(Posted on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 6:27 PM)

3. Danno said:

Thanks for the thoughts and screen grabs, Michael.

Looks to be another in a line of Arrow's grain-scrubbed let-downs. I don't know what's worse: Arrow's DNR'd-to-hell Blu-ray releases or their blindly devoted fan base!

(Posted on Monday, March 21, 2011 at 9:40 PM)

4. Miles said:

Thanks for the review. Another one to be avoided. I had hoped to be buying all of these Argento Blurays but it looks like I might end up buying none! The only Arrow disc on my shelf is CITY OF THE LIVING DEAD and I'm almost afraid now to put it into the player!

(Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 3:13 AM)

5. Vincent Pereira said:

Regarding example 12, I just pulled that same frame from both my Anchor Bay DVD (the "anamorphic" re-release) and the Japanese DVD and it has the same weird streaking as what you've posted. If you'd like I can e-mail you the frame grabs, unless what you're talking about isn't the streaking but something else.

Vincent

(Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 4:56 PM)

6. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Vincent:

Just to clarify, the streaking (which I would expect on such a rapidly moving shot) isn't what I was referring to but rather the strange "burn marks" all over the actresses' faces, particularly the one at the far right of the frame. It's perhaps not the best shot to show it, but everything looks as if it's melting... if that makes any sense. I'll try to dig out some more captures later.

(Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 5:45 PM)

7. ChuckZ said:

What is it with Jennifer Connelly and DVNR?

(Posted on Tuesday, March 22, 2011 at 7:19 PM)

8. Kram Sacul said:

Labyrinth fared pretty good.

(Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 12:37 AM)

9. ChuckZ said:

I was thinking Dark City.

(Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 1:22 AM)

10. Kentai said:

Requiem For A Dream is certainly free of DVNR (at least through Lionsgate), so it's not as if the lovely miss Connelly is eternally cursed.

Thanks Michael, as always, for posting your thoughts on this new Argento transfer. I'm disappointed that the only HD release for PHENOMENA due in the foreseeable future such a mediocre looking one, but I'm sure the asking price will be worth it just to finally see the Integral cut of the film.

Michael, do you happen to know when the Medusa 16:9 DVD came out? I'm assuming (though I could be mistaken) that this BD and that earlier DVD were taken from the same source, and if I'm right that could give us a rough idea when this particular transfer was minted. That's not to say that that a date would tell us wither or not the master materials suffer from DVNR, but it'd be interesting to know none the less.

Fear not, Miles - City of the Living Dead is free of DVNR, and looks all but identical to the US transfer (for better or worse). The encoding quality might be just a notch or two below the quality of Blue Underground's release, but trust me, that particular Arrow BD is anything but scrubbed! (If caps are anything to go by, Arrow's release of A Bay Of Blood also looks more film-like than any of their other HD efforts to date.)

(Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 7:48 AM)

11. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Kentai:

I don't think it's the same master as the Medusa DVD, which came out in 2003. The colour balance is completely different, as is the framing (more visible at the bottom and left and right hands sides and slightly less at the top on the BD in the shots I compared). As far as I can tell this is a completely new master, or at least one that hasn't been used for any DVD version I've seen before.

(Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 8:03 AM)

12. Phil Quail said:

I had a quick look at the Phenomena BD and was underwhelmed, but it's good to see your more detailed analysis. As you say, it is, at least, a bit of an improvement on the SD releases.

I must admit that I've reached a point where I automatically buy each new Arrow release (except Vamp...) but fully expect a poor transfer. At least that way the disappointment isn't too crushing. I appreciate the effort they make over the extras and packaging, it's just a shame they mess up the most important element.

(Posted on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM)

13. Vincent Pereira said:

While I'm not as disappointed with this as Michael was, I chalk that up to this being my first Arrow Blu-ray, and the fact that I've never been happy with how PHENOMENA has been presented on home video before period. This IS better than the many DVDs (and LaserDiscs) I have owned (and in some cases still own), but it is NOT "Beyond high-Definition" as the Blu-ray format promises.

Also, aside from image quality concerns, there are issues with the hybrid English/Italian soundtrack. There are a few obvious flubs that occurred in trying to sync the two up, and its not just that a few lines that should be in English are in Italian. There are sections where the audio is out of sync for a few seconds (i.e., it starts to soon or too late at the point of a cut), and some cases where the audio is REPEATED to make up for the Italian print being longer. In at least one of the later cases this occurred during a long stretch that didn't even have any dialogue, so I don't know why this was an issue at all- during non-dialogue scenes they should have just used the Italian mix and nothing would have been amiss, but I guess that would have been too easy (or smart) a solution...

Along with this shipment came my second Arrow Blu-ray, THE BEYOND. As I expected, I got the "incorrect" version with the black-and-white opening, but there's FAR MORE wrong with that disc than just that flub. The movie itself- which includes no less than five soundtracks including the commentaries- occupies less than 16 gigs, and the bit-rate (and I'm NOT a bit-rate junkie, but believe me as you read further this is just ridiculous) usually hovers in the low teens and frequently even single digits. I think I could count on one hand how many times it went above 20 Mb/s...

And beyond that, just like PHENOMENA, there are audio sync issues. Often sounds from the next scene start before scene changes, and at least one scene (*SPOILER!*when Martha discovers Joe's body*END SPOILER*) is pretty severely out of sync. There's also an obvious video flub when *SPOILER!*Joe the plumber gets his eyes gouged out- the scene skips back and several frames are repeated.*END SPOILER* Arrow might be good at putting together some nice interviews, but they need to put some serious effort into their QC department, as well.

Vincent

(Posted on Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 3:32 AM)

14. FoxyMulder said:

Regarding The Beyond, you should send your disc to Arrow, they have re-released it with a higher bitrate on a BD-50 and i believe they said the BD-25 releases should never have made their way into shops.

I'll wait for some other company to release both of those films.

(Posted on Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 6:56 AM)

15. Phil Quail said:

There's no need to physically return The Beyond BD to Arrow, you just need to email them, with a copy of your receipt, to request a replacement (having said that, I don't know if the replacement discs even exist yet). Details here:

http://www.cult-labs.com/forums/beyond/4899-beyond-%96-official-returns-policy.html

There's been much talk of the review discs and initial retail copies being BD-25s, and speculation that the whole transfer will be redone, but in my pessimistic way I'm expecting nothing more than the sepia tint on the opening sequence.

For what it's worth, the existing transfer looked rubbish to me. Without even inspecting for things like DNR, it's too bright and just generally looks "thin".

(Posted on Thursday, March 24, 2011 at 10:53 AM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.