Individual Entry
Land of Whimsy / news / Individual Entry
Monday, March 28, 2011
BD impressions: Tangled
10:33 PM / BD Impressions /
13 Comments
The film: A number of Disney features have had what are known in the trade as "troubled productions", but TANGLED has got to rank as one of the rockiest of them all. Originally set to be the directorial debut of veteran animator Glen Keane, it started out during the Michael Eisner era as a straight adaptation of the Rapunzel story - and indeed its title, until shortly before its release, was RAPUNZEL - then became a wise-ass "ironic" retelling called RAPUNZEL UNBRAIDED to cash in on the success of the loathsome SHREK movies. That version was in turn canned, Keane stepped down due to health concerns, and the project finally saw the light of day somewhere in the region of a decade after we first heard about it. Whew!
I mention all this because there's really nothing about TANGLED (still can't get used to that name change) that suggests such a lengthy and complicated history. On the contrary, it's hard to shake the impression that it feels a lot like a side project that was put into production quickly, with its directors (Byron Howard and Nathan Greno) largely adhering to the Disney book of animation clichés. It's slick, inoffensive and an enjoyable enough way to kill 100 minutes, but like the previous year's THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG it takes no risks whatsoever, and unlike that film it lacks the hand-drawn charm that really made it feel as if Disney was returning to its roots. The songs are entirely forgettable (was Alan Menken having an off-day or something?), the leading man (around whom most of the marketing has focused, despite it being Rapunzel's story) is just a bland copy of Disney's earlier Aladdin, the chameleon sidekick is irritating and largely pointless...
I can't say I disliked it, and there were moments that made me smile, but while watching it I found myself unable to shake the feeling that the supposed return to form that has occurred since John Lasseter and co took over the running of Walt Disney Animation Studios is to some extent a self-perpetuated marketing strategy rather than any real turnaround in terms of the quality of their output. (On the other hand, the last film released before Lasseter came on board was CHICKEN LITTLE...) Year by year, placing the output of Disney and Pixar side by side - BOLT vs. WALL-E, THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG vs. UP, TANGLED vs. TOY STORY 3 - it's pretty clear that the latter remain the undisputed kings of feature animation, and that Disney has yet to put out anything as fresh, witty and original as its one true gem of the 21st century so far, LILO & STITCH. 6/10
Image quality: Barring some compression artefacts in a small number of scenes (see Example 8), this is reference quality material. Any criticisms are entering into the realm of nit-picking, but this wouldn't be a Land of Whimsy review without nit-picking, would it? It falls just shy of perfection, and I can't imagine anyone having any serious complaints. 9.5/10
Tangled
studio: Buena Vista; country: USA; region code: ABC;
codec: AVC; aspect ratio: 1.78:1 (theatrical 1.85:1)
13 Comments
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.
Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.
Archives
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- News Archive Index
Categories
- Animation
- BD Impressions
- Blu-ray
- Books
- Cinema
- DVD
- Games
- General
- HD DVD
- Model Railways
- Music
- Podcast
- Reviews
- Technology
- Television
- Web























1. FoxyMulder said:
The original Shrek wasn't that bad, nor was the first sequel, the third one though was lacking a lot and i might agree with you on that one but can you really use such strong words to describe Shrek, seriously!
Anyway i liked the first two, haven't seen the fourth one.
(Posted on Tuesday, March 29, 2011 at 12:12 AM)