Sunday, May 22, 2011

BD impressions: Black Swan

1:50 PM / BD Impressions / Comments7 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

The film: As Mike Sutton says in his review of BLACK SWAN at The Digital Fix, Darren Aronofsky's latest movie is essentially "high-trash melodrama". It's frequently over the top and absurd, and revels in all sorts of daft clichés about mental illness - particularly the A/B white/black personality split from which its heroine suffers... and yet despite all this it's a dazzling, visceral piece of work if you accept it on its own terms. I don't personally think Natalie Portman deserves quite the degree of plauditry she's received for the role (as I've mentioned on a few occasions now, I felt that her fellow BAFTA nominee Noomi Rapace wiped the floor with her as Lisbeth Salander in THE GIRL WITH THE DRAGON TATTOO, and as far as I'm concerned the award went to the wrong actress), but the shrill hysteria that infuses her performance is entirely suited to the overall mood of the film and calls to mind Catherine Deneuve in Polanski's REPULSION.

REPULSION, in fact, is probably the film from which BLACK SWAN draws most influence (except, of course, for SHOWGIRLS) in its portrait of a deeply disturbed young woman slowly unravelling. A lot of people, among them Mark Kermode, have loudly proclaimed Aronofsky to have been borrowing wholesale from Dario Argento, and while the ballet setting and focus on a wide-eyed ingénue dancer (as well as some of the colour choices during the climax) do call to mind SUSPIRIA, I do think the similarities have been overplayed to a certain extent. Indeed, if any Argento film informs BLACK SWAN to any great extent (and I have to believe that Aronofsky was indeed drawing on the maestro's work, at least subconsciously), it's OPERA, with Portman taking on the Cristina Marsillach role (complete with domineering mother figure) and Vincent Cassel in Ian Charleson's part.

Regardless of the influences it wears so openly, though, BLACK SWAN does manage to feel cohesive and manages to forge its own identity despite not really bringing anything new to the table. I know a few people who outright loathe the film for its over the top and absurd nature, and others who think it's a load of pretentious wank masquerading as high-brow in order to avoid admitting that it's basically a B-horror movie with pretensions above its station. I see their point but I don't really agree with them: once I saw BLACK SWAN for what it is - an old-fashioned pulp horror movie packaged as high art - I got completely on board with its merging of high art and exploitation. 8/10

Image quality: Like Aronofsky's previous film, THE WRESTLER, BLACK SWAN was shot on 16mm film. The result is very grainy, and as such the usual caveat applies: it looks considerably more detailed in motion than in still frame form. The captures look a little on the soft and clumpy side, but while there ARE some shots that are naturally softer than others, the overall effect in motion is quite pleasing. As usual, Fox have done a bang-up job with the encode, resulting in a very satisfying presentation, provided you know what to expect and accept the film's intended look for what it is. 9/10

Black Swan
studio: 20th Century Fox; disc country: USA; region code: AB;
codec: AVC; aspect ratio: 2.39:1

Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan Black Swan

 
7 Comments

1. Parotaku said:

The film also 'borrows' a lot from director Satoshi Kon (tragically deceased last year) first anime film "Perfect Blue", which I found a lot more subtle than "Black Swan"...
You should definately watch it if you haven't! ;)

(Posted on Sunday, May 22, 2011 at 6:01 PM)

2. Kentai said:

Michael... drop whatever you're doing and watch Perfect Blue right this second. Seriously, every minute you're not watching it, a kitten, somewhere, is dying. I admit, I can't prove these events are related, but how can we be sure? Can you spend the next several minutes taking that risk? You don't want furry little mewling kitties to die... do you?

(...too dark? Did I need a smiley in there somewhere?)

Not only is it the only animated film I can think of that may legitimately qualify as a giallo feature (and a decent one, at that), but Aronofsky really tore its' wings off wholesale for Black Swan. Even the names of the characters (Mima vs Nina) are so blatantly alike that I'm surprised how many more people are trying to pass this off an Argento-inspired piece...

(Posted on Sunday, May 22, 2011 at 7:06 PM)

3. Count Fosco said:

Let's do PERFECT BLUE (been meaning to see it for a while now) and another anime for the podcast? If we feel a bit green when it comes to this genre I've an anime 'expert' candidate in mind who could join us. By the way I'm heading onto Skype now if you fancy making that chin-wag a bit earlier?

(Posted on Sunday, May 22, 2011 at 7:10 PM)

4. Marcus said:

Not the first time Aronofsky borrowed from Perfect Blue. Anyone remember the underwater screaming shot from Requiem for a Dream?

(Posted on Monday, May 23, 2011 at 6:05 AM)

5. Greg M said:

Black Swan is great... but Perfect Blue beats it for sure. Absolute classic. The world is a much shittier place without the incomparable Satoshi Kon in it!

(Posted on Monday, May 23, 2011 at 7:35 AM)

6. dmc1973 said:

Didn't Aronofsky buy the remake rights to "Perfect Blue" specifically to use the underwater shot for "Requiem"?

(Posted on Monday, May 23, 2011 at 8:46 AM)

7. Craig M said:

Black Swan is my favourite movie of the year so far. The comparisons to Satoshi Kon's Perfect Blue were obvious to me too, and of Argento's work and Polanski's Repulsion. Arronofsky borrowed from the best here and the movie deserves to become a classic for years to follow.

Nice write up as usual, Michael.

(Posted on Monday, May 23, 2011 at 6:37 PM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.