Monday, August 15, 2011

BD impressions: TRON: Legacy

4:26 PM / BD Impressions / Comments14 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

The film: The original TRON left me cold. The sequel, oddly enough, impressed me more despite suffering from a raft of problems of its own. The plot is as generic as they come - augmenting the original's "defeat the evil emperor" with the overused "boy grows into man" framework - and Garrett Hedlund has got to be the most singularly wooden and uncharismatic lead I've seen in a movie in quite some time. But it has plenty of strengths too, not least an inspired (and more coherent) visual design for the Grid (though is it just me or do most of the visual and aural cues owe a debt to the MASS EFFECT game series?), as well as a more mature Jeff Bridges in grizzled sensei mode. It's actually a shame he's relegated to a supporting role - I'd much rather have watched a film about him, Olivia Wilde and her Louise Brooks wig than the personality vacuum that is Hedlund. Still, it never drags (unlike the original, and despite being nearly half an hour longer than it), and it stands up well as an actual film rather than the technology demo the original ended up resembling. Just don't mention the the uncanny valley Jeff Bridges CGI stand-in. 6/10

Image quality: A plea to all filmmakers: can you PLEASE stop making these multi-aspect ratio IMAX films, or at the very least stop releasing them on BD in this form? At least offer us an opportunity to watch the film in 2.39:1 from beginning to end, as we would have done had we gone to see it in a non-IMAX cinema. It's not clever, it destroys any sense of immersion and, most annoyingly of all, it draws your attention to the fact that, for home viewing, what you're getting with the 2.39:1 ratio is an image that is less tall rather than wider. TRON: LEGACY jumps between 1.78:1 and 2.39:1 throughout its running time, often seemingly arbitrarily (some dialogue scenes are 1.78:1, some action scenes are 2.39:1, and vice versa), and it adds nothing to the presentation.

With that little rant out of the way, TRON: LEGACY looks rather good on BD, though it's limited by the digital cameras used to shoot it in a way that its predecessor's 70mm photography wasn't. Interestingly, while the original TRON's "real world" photography was basically flawless and its "Grid" photography suffered slightly as a result of its heavy use of opticals, it's the other way round here: the digital photography lends itself well to the cold, artificial world of the Grid (and a lot of what we're seeing in those scenes is actually wall-to-wall CG anyway), but in the "real world" scenes, it has the feel of a cheap made-for-TV production. Shots occasionally look harsh and processed too - see Example 11. There's also a dead pixel visible in one shot, though I must point out I only noticed it after taking the capture.

That said, I suspect the disc is largely a faithful representation of the master. Mild compression artefacts are visible on occasions - see Example 2 - but otherwise it's a solid disc. Recommended.

TRON: Legacy
label: Buena vista; disc country: UK; region code: ABC;
codec: AVC; aspect ratio: 1.78:1 and 2.39:1

TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy TRON: Legacy

 
14 Comments

1. Neil Harrison said:

What's up with the uncredited Cillian Murphy cameo near the start?

(Posted on Monday, August 15, 2011 at 10:36 PM)

2. dma1973 said:

A set up for Tron 3 would be my guess

(Posted on Monday, August 15, 2011 at 11:59 PM)

3. Adam said:

"Garrett Hedlund has got to be the most singularly wooden and uncharismatic lead I've seen in a movie in quite some time."

I hope you continue your streak of never seeing anything Channing Tatum is in then. I wish I could say the same!

(Posted on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 1:34 AM)

4. Kram Sacul said:

If the variable aspect ratio bother you you can always add your own mattes to the bottom and the top. Several software players allow you to do this pretty easily.

(Posted on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 1:41 AM)

5. Phil Quail said:

""Garrett Hedlund has got to be the most singularly wooden and uncharismatic lead I've seen in a movie in quite some time."

I hope you continue your streak of never seeing anything Channing Tatum is in then. I wish I could say the same!"


Let's not forget the inexplicably successful Mr Sam Worthington....

(Posted on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 11:59 AM)

6. FoxyMulder said:

Quick question.

Does this suffer from any of the image issues that plagued The Dark Knight on blu ray. ?

I feel they should ditch the bulky, noisy IMAX cameras and just shoot Super Panavision 70, i wish Nolan was doing this for The Dark Knight Rises.

(Posted on Tuesday, August 16, 2011 at 3:29 PM)

7. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Adam:

You know, I don't believe I've ever seen a Channing Tatum film. I suppose I should count myself lucky?


Kram:

True, but that's not really an option when watching on a standalone BD player, and in any event I have a feeling this would wreck the composition. I very much doubt the 1.78:1 shots are a simple case of open matte. I'd imagine they both gain and lose visual information (more at the top and bottom, less at the sides), before we even take into account adjustments to the vertical position of the image for the 2.39:1 version.

Foxymulder:

D'you mean the sharpening and lack of fine detail in THE DARK KNIGHT's 35mm scenes? In that case no. If you're referring to problems with THE DARK KNIGHT's IMAX sequences, I can't really say as I don't remember any issues during those sequences. Anyway, as far as I'm aware both the IMAX and non-IMAX sequences in TRON: LEGACY were shot using the same equipment.

(Posted on Sunday, August 21, 2011 at 5:19 PM)

8. FoxyMulder said:

There was a scene shot using IMAX where we see Batman standing atop a tall building and its night and there was an edge halo around his cape, i know its IMAX due to the aspect ratio change, that was a rare scene showing an edge halo on an IMAX shot scene though, but i was asking if they took the IMAX blowup footage and used it for the blu ray as Warner seemed to do for The Dark Knight blu ray, as i believe thats why the edge halo's are on that release.

From the images posted it appears they did not.

(Posted on Monday, August 22, 2011 at 1:38 PM)

9. Neil Harrison said:

Curious question about WB's faults on The Dark Knight and many other HD releases elsewhere. Not directed at one person, this is a general question, once a bd's faults have been raised and clearly identified, do you enjoy sitting back and watching the actual film itself?

(Posted on Tuesday, August 23, 2011 at 10:38 PM)

10. Matthew McKinnon said:

@Neil:
That's actually a familiar question on this site. The film reviews and discussions here would suggest that people do, no?

(Posted on Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 1:48 PM)

11. Neil Harrison said:

Sorry, was a snarky post that should not have been left. I blame alcohol. :(

(Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 at 3:19 AM)

12. Matthew McKinnon said:

Neil - I do it all the time. Alcohol and the Internet are not good bedfellows.

(Posted on Friday, August 26, 2011 at 1:23 PM)

13. Neil Harrison said:

"Alcohol and the Internet are not good bedfellows."

I agree. And thanks for the kind post.

(Posted on Sunday, August 28, 2011 at 1:07 AM)

14. FoxyMulder said:

To answer the question.

I still enjoy the film, i notice the flaws but still enjoy the film, after all i watch SD resolution satellite channels such as Film Four, i still enjoy the films on them despite the image quality being poor.

During the video nasty era of the eighties i used to buy pirated uncut copies on VHS of Zombie Flesh Eaters, The Beyond and many other films which were once banned, the image quality was crap, i still enjoyed the films.

(Posted on Sunday, August 28, 2011 at 5:45 PM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.