Sunday, October 14, 2012

BD Impressions: Raiders of the Lost Ark

2:57 PM / BD Impressions / Comments7 Comments

BD Impressions
Blu-ray

The long-awaited INDIANA JONES: THE COMPLETE ADVENTURES has finally made it to Blu-ray, containing all three films in the Indiana Jones trilogy and, erm, THE KINGDOM OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL. I'm not sure I'll have time to do BD Impressions pieces on all four films, but I couldn't pass up the opportunity to cover the first and, as is so often the case, best film, 1981's RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK.

The film: I'm unabashed in my love of RAIDERS. It's fantastic: action-packed, heart-stopping, funny as hell. While some people would point to JAWS or CLOSE ENCOUNTERS as their favourite Spielberg film, this one has always got my vote. I saw it as a young kid and, like so many films first experienced at that age, it wormed its way into my subconscious to the extent that, even though I didn't revisit the film until several years later, when I finally did I found I knew it more or less off by heart. And it's one of those special films where knowing what's coming next is no bad thing: the fun lies in its familiarity, and it just gets better with age. I've always found Harrison Ford to be a fairly wooden actor, but oddly enough it doesn't hurt this film one iota, and in many cases his slightly stilted delivery actually adds to the comedy. Karen Allen is brilliant - she was always my favourite Indy leading lady, and the stuff she gets up to here just reinforces how wasted she was when they brought her back for CRYSTAL SKULL. Unlike Mrs. Spielberg in TEMPLE OF DOOM, who served a similar function, her schtick is endearing rather than infuriating, and I love the fact that she's neither a screaming damsel in distress or an unbelievable Strong Independent Woman(TM): she's brash, goofy and actually a bit of a lightweight, even though she clearly thinks of herself as a hard-ass. And of course there are the villains: in particular, Ronald Lacey makes for one of the most sinister movie Nazis ever, which takes some doing.

I can't really say anything else about the film that you haven't heard before. If you've seen it, I've a suspicion you'll agree with all of the above. If you haven't seen it... what the hell is wrong with you, and why are you still reading this? See it now! 10/10

Image quality: For this Blu-ray release, much has been made of the fact that RAIDERS has received a new 4k scan from the camera negative, which I take to mean that, for TEMPLE OF DOOM and LAST CRUSADE, older masters have been reused. I haven't looked at them in any detail yet, so I'll restrict this discussion to RAIDERS, which looks extremely impressive indeed. Shot in anamorphic Panavision, the image has the smooth, fine grain look you'd normally expect from this process. Colours look much warmer than the cooler-looking DVD version that was released nearly a decade ago in the THE ADVENTURES OF INDIANA JONES box set (and was reviewed very positively at the time), but aside from the rather blown-out contrasts during the opening credits (taken from a source at least a couple of generations removed from the negative, naturally, since RAIDERS is a pre-DI title and they haven't been re-composited for this release), the overall balance of colour, contrast etc. is very pleasing to the eye. Either way, the present colour timing comes with Spielberg's blessing, and while that doesn't automatically count for everything (remember the FriedkinVision FRENCH CONNECTION BD from a few years back?), I reckon it stands for a lot more than looking at older DVDs and automatically assuming THEY were accurate and this isn't. Quoting TLEFilms' Torsten Kaiser on the subject:

Re: RAIDERS OF THE LOST ARK: Pretty much "the same picture" as with [the 2012 European BD release of THE TERMINATOR]: close (to the original mostly), but not 100% perfect; but compared to everything before on video masters A HUGE LEAP forward. Everyone who ownes an LPP of the re-issue will know.

(Source: Blu-ray.com forum)

There are a handful of minor glitches that prevent this disc achieving perfection. The aforementioned opening titles with their constrained dynamic range are one; another is this shot of the spiders on Alfred Molina's back, which has a very strange appearance - almost like the effect of watching a 3D film without glasses. I don't know whether it's some sort of compositing side effect, but it doesn't look like an optical so I'm inclined to assume not. There's also a shot at around 01:55:00 where Indy hides from the Nazi U-boat where heavier-than-usual grain has clearly been digitally reduced, but that's really the only shot in the entire film that shows obvious signs of digital manipulation. Otherwise it's an extremely impressive presentation - one of the best I've ever seen for a catalogue title, and continues the almost unbroken streak of Spielberg films receiving top drawer treatment on BD. 9.5/10

Raiders of the Lost Ark
label: Paramount; disc country: USA; region code: ABC;
codec: AVC; aspect ratio: 2.39:1

Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark Raiders of the Lost Ark

 
7 Comments

1. FoxyMulder said:

They made brand new 4K scans of the original 3 films, this has been confirmed by Paramount and was discussed on the thread over at Home Theater Forum.

(Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 at 7:34 PM)

2. FoxyMulder said:

That shot in the cave has always looked that way, some scenes are out of focus and softer and it's just part of the original photography, this is my favourite film of all time, seen it over 120 times over the years.

(Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 at 7:37 PM)

3. Robin said:

I watched this last Sunday and Temple of Doom tonight, and they both look quite stellar. Great detail (the maharadjas bling for example is purest eyecandy), grain intact, deep colors, dark blacks. While I haven't analyzed them in full detail, I have no qualms whatsoever. From what little I've seen of Last Crusade it's also quite a stunner. Fantastic set.

In watching Raiders again, I did find the tempo quite lacking, and it's a very serious film in comparison with the sequels. Not humorless, but not as zany wham-bam nonstop as the others. I guess it's simply a matter of preference, but I prefer Temple overall, even if Raiders has my deep respect and Crusade is a great little way to uhm..end it. Crystal Skull is not the worst film I've seen, but we sure could've done without it.

(Posted on Sunday, October 14, 2012 at 10:11 PM)

Agreed!
'Raiders' is the best Spielberg film.

(Posted on Monday, October 15, 2012 at 3:15 PM)

5. Author Profile Page Michael said:

FOXYMULDER:

They may be 4k, but I find it hard to believe TEMPLE OF DOOM and LAST CRUSADE's masters are brand new. I watched TEMPLE last night and spotted several instances in which backgrounds (matte paintings, I assume) were completely frozen, one of Lowry Digital's "trademarks" from several years ago. They certainly don't look like they were done on the same equipment (or indeed by the same people - the whole approach is completely different in terms of grain reduction, artificial sharpening etc.) as RAIDERS.

Re: the cave shot, it's not just softness: large parts of the image seem to "dance around" independent of the rest of the frame. Could be some sort of stabilisation effect gone wrong, I suppose, but I'm only clutching at straws here.

On a side note, I must confess that after seeing TEMPLE again and enduring the "character" of Willie Scott, rewatching CRYSTAL SKULL no longer seems like quite such a terrifying prospect.

(Posted on Monday, October 15, 2012 at 9:57 PM)

6. FoxyMulder said:

Its Lucasfilm, it wouldn't surprise me if they are older masters, it's in this long thread somewhere where they make claims of 4K.

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/t/323399/while-we-wait-for-a-few-words-about-raiders-of-the-lost-ark-in-blu-ray

As for Temple Of Doom, i love it, Kingdom Of The Crystal Skull is painfully forced and what the hall is John Hurt doing, his character is vurtually pointless, oh and lets have several waterfalls instead of the one we used in Temple Of Doom, lets repeat the chase sequence from Raiders but add swinging monkeys and CGI backdrops, what a load of crap, if it wasn't for Harrison Ford it would be excrutiating, the first half was fine, the second half was a disaster.

Count me in as someone who actually liked Kate Capshaw in the second film, she was funny and amusing to me in several scenes and i really enjoyed the horror aspects of that film and it has a few standout action scenes.

I never minded the fridge scene from Crystal Skull, that was logical to me since it's the only escape route and this is an escapism series of films, what i mind is the total lack of creativity shown during the second half of the film which just rips off the best bits of the previous films but adds poorly judged humour, it was lacking heart and emotion, something the other films have in spades, too many characters in the mix, i didn't mind the alien ending, i did mind that Indy really had nothing much to do at the end and they ran out of ideas.

There could have been a very interesting crystal skulls story there based on the real skulls, instead they took a wrong turn somewhere, i'd have preferred a supernatural approach to it all.

(Posted on Monday, October 15, 2012 at 10:58 PM)

7. FoxyMulder said:

P.S. I never spellchecked the above post, i should have.

(Posted on Monday, October 15, 2012 at 10:59 PM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.