Monday, February 4, 2013

Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012

3:00 PM / Podcast / Comments14 Comments

Later than intended and longer than anticipated, the Movie Matters podcast returns for its first instalment of the new year. In the first part of this bumper six-hour epic, co-hosts Lee Howard and Michael Mackenzie count down their personal top ten films of the previous year, celebrating both the very best and worst that 2012 had to offer. In part two, the attention shifts to the listeners' choices as Lee and Michael read out and listen to MP3s of submitted Top 10 lists, before turning their attention to the year ahead, revealing their most anticipated films of the next twelve months.

Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012 Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012 Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012

The music in this episode is all sampled from films in our Top 10 lists.

Created by Lee Howard & Michael Mackenzie
Edited by Michael Mackenzie
Music selection and editing by Lee Howard

Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012 Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012 Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012

PS. Listeners, we want YOUR feedback. What do you think of the format for this year's show? Do you like the listeners' lists being kept separate, or would you prefer them to be interspersed with the hosts' Top 10 lists? Do you like the show being split into two instalments, or would you prefer just to have a single MP3 file? Let us know how this experiment was for you, and we'll take any suggestions into consideration this time next year when we come to do our "best of 2013" show.

Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012 Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012 Movie Matters #19 - Top 10 of 2012

http://moviematterspodcast.blogspot.com
http://letterboxd.com/moviematters

 
14 Comments

1. Baron Scarpia said:

Hang on. That poster for Berberian Sound Studio. Is that an intentional homage to Argento?

(Posted on Monday, February 4, 2013 at 8:23 PM)

2. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Absolutely. The film is about an English sound engineer who goes to work on an Italian horror film in the 1970s.

(Posted on Monday, February 4, 2013 at 8:47 PM)

Michael - if you enjoyed 'Killer Joe' watch 'Bug'. You wouldn't have been as surprised that Friedkin directed 'KJ', if you'd seen 'Bug' first. Same vein. 'Bug' is better, imo.

(Posted on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 4:18 PM)

Also, Friedkin's 'Cruising' is excellent.

(Posted on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 4:22 PM)

5. Author Profile Page Michael said:

Cheers for the recommendations, Dan. I do indeed have a DVD of BUG waiting to be watched, so that'll probably be my first port of call. I've only heard good things about CRUISING too.

(Posted on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 7:34 PM)

6. Count Fosco said:

I can sort you out CRUISING if need be. Originally supposed to be directed by De Palma.

(Posted on Tuesday, February 5, 2013 at 8:51 PM)

Rock on! Still making my way through the first ep. :)

(Posted on Wednesday, February 6, 2013 at 3:58 AM)

I'm with Lee on 'The Avengers' - FUN!
I'm not into "realistic" comic-book movies - it's why the Burton Batmans are my fave. 'Batman Returns' rules!

(Posted on Thursday, February 7, 2013 at 3:47 PM)

9. Matthew McKinnon said:

I can say bad things about 'Cruising', if you like. It's a bit of a shambles.

(Posted on Friday, February 8, 2013 at 6:49 AM)

10. Kentai said:

Whatever Matthew says is a lie, I assure you. (I kid, I kid! But I do love me some CRUISING.) Without a doubt, my favorite Pachino performance.

A shame Willie went nuts on the restored version's color pallette, but I'm still holding out hope a Blu-ray will correct that eventually - or at least provide both as an option. The stuff he did during the drug sequences was actually kind of cool. The cold, dull coloration that permeates the rest of the movie... not as much.

(Posted on Tuesday, February 12, 2013 at 4:26 AM)

11. Matthew McKinnon said:

We'll have to Agree To Differ on "Cruising", then. But every time I come back to it, I'm disappointed and angry. I think it's ramshackle, mean spirited and exploitative. And the ending is a) ridiculous, b) ineptly and clumsily handled, and c) offensive.

On the subject of colour-timing, is it still blasphemy to say that I actually liked what Friedkin did on the first French Connection blu-ray release? It was interesting and pretty. I'm glad there's an un-tampered version out there now, obviously, and that should have been in the package to begin with. But I like the pointillist look of the Friedkin version.

(Posted on Friday, February 15, 2013 at 6:10 PM)

12. Kentai said:

"I think it's ramshackle, mean spirited and exploitative."
Well, now I'm confused - you say that like it's a bad thing!

Sure, I can see the film rubbing people the wrong way. I think that was kind of the whole point, though, and I'd more readily compare the grim, brutal exploration of murky sexual identity to movies like THE NEW YORK RIPPER and TETSUO: THE IRON MAN before I went to anything resembling a more conventional "undercover cops" narrative. Maybe there are better films that deal with those anxieties, and if you've got some examples of what you think is a better example than this, I'm all ears.

For me, anyway, those few almost subliminal frames of [you-know-what spliced] into the opening murder set the whole nihilistic, offensive and unpredictable tone for the film as a whole, and the final reel seems like an appropriately offensive and bombastic finale to what is - admittedly - an ugly, sleazy film that can't definitively say what it wants, because even the narrative doesn't seem to know anymore.

(I've never seen Friedkin's THE BOYS IN THE BAND myself, but from the sound of it that'd certainly be an interesting film to watch in tandem with Cruising...)


It's fair to say that the Friedkenized version of THE FRENCH CONNECTION is "interesting". So are the Comic Bookified version of THE WARRIORS, the CG enhanced version of GHOST IN THE SHELL, and that... thing, they did to create SHOGUN ASSASSINS. None of these examples are so offensive that they shouldn't exist, I suppose, but they also shouldn't be the de-facto version made available to the public.

(Posted on Thursday, February 21, 2013 at 4:15 AM)

13. Matthew McKinnon said:

I think we sort of agree on what "Cruising" is, but just react differently to it.
I've always found Friedkin a bit of a tabloid filmmaker, and as much as I like a couple of his films, I don't take him very seriously.

By that I mean that he's more eager to get a reaction, is more sensationalist than thoughtful. So in the case of "Cruising", I don't see him making this sleazy, exaggerated muck-raking film with anything more in mind than a kind of gloating "wait til they see this!" kind of mentality. The way he rapturously describes what was cut, as well, kind of adds to this impression.

Re: the "French Connection" transfer. I totally agree. I was as angry as everyone else that the original wasn't made available. But now it is, I'm willing to admit to liking the look of the new grade as an interesting experiment.

(Posted on Friday, February 22, 2013 at 5:29 PM)

14. Jago Turner said:

This podcast was almost as long as Sergei Bondarchuk's War and Peace. And like that film you think it's going to be too long but then find yourself so engrossed that you emerge six hours later wondering why you didn't take it in sections. A great job. How many breaks did you take in the recording? I'd have had to get through about nineteen packets of throat lozenges and about 76 cups of tea and my voiee would have still been shot by the half way mark. Well done!

(Posted on Monday, March 4, 2013 at 9:42 AM)

 
To combat spam, commenting is automatically disabled on entries older than 30 days.

Did a comment you tried to post accidentally get eaten by the spam filter? It happens from time to time. I get upwards of 200 spam comments every day and unfortunately don't have the time to weed through all of them in case something genuine ended up there by mistake. If one of your posts gets incorrectly flagged as spam, email me at m.r.mackenzie[at]gmail[dot]com and I'll do my best to retrieve it.