Saturday, December 30, 2006

(*) The Machinist ****

Spain/USA: Brad Anderson, 2004

IMDB reference

 

Friday, December 29, 2006

Kiss Kiss Bang Bang ****½

USA: Shane Black, 2005

IMDB reference

 

Wednesday, December 27, 2006

(*) Home Alone *****

USA: Chris Columbus, 1990

IMDB reference

 

Friday, December 22, 2006

The Adventures of Robin Hood ****

USA: Michael Curtiz/William Keighley, 1938

IMDB reference

 

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Basic Instinct ***

USA/France: Paul Verhoeven, 1992

IMDB reference

 

Monday, December 18, 2006

(*) Casablanca *****

USA: Michael Curtiz, 1942

IMDB reference

 

Sunday, December 17, 2006

(*) Miami Vice *½

USA: Michael Mann, 2006

(Watched with commentary by Michael Mann)

IMDB reference

 

Saturday, December 16, 2006

(*) Operation Crossbow ****

UK: Michael Anderson, 1965

IMDB reference

 

Wednesday, December 13, 2006

(*) Enemy of the State ****

USA: Tony Scott, 1998

IMDB reference

 

Tuesday, December 12, 2006

Miami Vice *½

USA: Michael Mann, 2006

I've never seen the 80s TV series on which this film is based, so I really didn't know what to expect.

All I can say is that I'm glad this was a review copy and thus something I didn't have to pay for, except with the two hours and twenty minutes of my life that I'll never get back. Miami Vice is an incoherent mess, an eyesore and assault on the ears. It's one hundred and forty minutes of Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx slicking back their hair and/or adjusting their shades as they swagger around various seaside locations with their jaws firmly set and their designer shades glinting in the sunlight. The plot feels like your average 45-minute cop show stretched out to beyond the normal length of a feature film, while the characters are nothing more than mere archetypes who spit out corny dialogue and offer us glaring insights into their tedious and insincere emotions.

Style-wise, the film is all over the place. Mann shot it using a combination of traditional 35mm and 1080p high definition. Some of it looks fine, but the night scenes look absolutely vile, filled with obnoxious amounts of digital noise. Meanwhile, a whole lot of scenes have what can only be described as a motion blur effect, presumably the result of shooting the footage interlaced and then deinterlacing it for the final transfer. Mann used similar techniques on his previous film, Collateral, and they were just as bad there. If this is the future of cinema, I think I'd prefer to remain in the past. Oh, and the camerawork is dreadful, too: I get that Mann wanted to convey a sense of urgency, but when your viewpoint is jittering all of the place, Blair Witch-style, I feel ready to vomit rather than being drawn into the action.

Not recommended.

IMDB reference

 
More posts

1 2

13 entries